In my opinion, Kennedy's win of the Presidency was a mistake, and his win was made possible by his dad having mob ties. It is no secret that the mob helped in "obtaining" the necessary votes to tilt the win. That being said, Kennedy was rubbed out by a group of people who understood that their real man, Nixon, was supposed to have won the election according to the plan. They didn't count on Kennedy's apparent win through the help from the mob.

Also, we don't have to worry about mistakes like that happening anymore, thats why the government setup the Diebold system to make sure things go as planned and they are not forced to "take care" of the guy who wasn't supposed to win. Anybody remember Florida? Ot that went down by way of the memory hole?

It's a well known fact that JFK was not going to withdraw from the Vietnam War. In fact his re-election ticket rode on staying the course in Vietnam. This has been stated many times by Noam Chomsky during interviews about the rise of GOP. After JFK died many publishers rewrote his history to make him out to be a great Idealist. However he wasn't the idealist authors make him out to be.

sarahDJ: the video, which you did not watch, is very detailed and covers George H.W. "poppie" Bush's time in the CIA.

Rush bimbaugh is a paid government propagandist like the rest in the mainstream media, sorry to burst your bubble:)

It is easy to slander the dead, but a little research will reveal that most of the things blamed on JFK were done by LBJ after JFK's death. JFK was riding the U.S. of the Federal Reserve and pulling troops from Viet-Nam, that was all reversed with his death, showing the motive, who benefits.

The Mainstream Media's misreporting demonstraites that they all are paid propagandist, most belong to the Council on Foreign Relations, a group that runs the U.S. in a RICO conspiracy setup.

I think this is way off base. What possible motive could Bush have for wanting a President like Kennedy dead? Conspiracy theories can be interesting, but they should have some real logic behind them.

Kennedy was more conservative than Richard Nixon and his tax cuts were bigger at the top than Ronald Reagan's. With Nixon we got the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Supplemental Security Income program, the Office of Minority Business Enterprise, and pursuit of a National Health Insurance (NHI) Plan...practically a Green candidate by today's standards.

Rush Limbaugh was reviewing a Kennedy speech and called him a "dittohead" (I didn't hear it because I don't listen to Rush, but I read it in National Review http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/flashback-bowman080103.asp

Of the two judges Kennedy appointed to the Supreme Court, one of them was the very conservative Byron White, one of the original two dissenters of Roe v. Wade. Of the four judges Nixon appointed to the Supreme court, only one was very conservative (William Rehnquist).

During Nixon's first year in office, 1969, the "draft lottery" began. Prior to that, young men could avoid the draft by attending college or private schools.
1970, the first year of major troop withdrawals from Vietnam and in 1973 the military draft was cancelled in favor of an all-volunteer force.

more info to compare Nixon and Kennedy at the following links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/progjfk1.htm


The History Channel ran a documentary in November of 2005 called:
"The Kennedy Assassination: Beyond Conspiracy"
It pretty much agreed with most of what I read in the following article explaining how Cuba was behind the Kennedy assassination.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/01/04/wkenn04.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/01/04/ixnewstop.html
I also read a book by Kenneth C. Davis and he details how Kennedy was involved in trying to have Castro killed.

Though it is best to check your sources before anyone autmoatically accepts what someone else says, sometimes you have to take their word... but in this case the information is secure and right.

Bush sr. is the one spoken of, little Bush-you can find plenty of documentares on him otherplaces, because this is greatly about his father and those involved in the JFK conspiracy.

P.s. It was a conspiracy... or no just a collection of unfortunate events.

At the end a reminder is given to research other things: Bush jr. and the recent Kennedy, but also more important 911.

So get out there and don't waste anything yall learn, spread and influence yall! Don't forget to remmember 911 WTC 7 was brought down by the leaseholder of the Complex and yet the NIST and FEMA deny what he said-I personally got the reply that there is no evidence he did what he said on video.

JFK was that favorite conspracy theory, great evidence for it, 911 is the new one.

I believe this is the Hankey film. An amateur production. It is quite interesting.

His main point is that George HW Bush killed JFK, or helped. This is part of a school of thought that the CIA and Bush and possibly Nixon, LBJ, and others were aligned in a conspiracy to kill JFK.

Some decent circumstantial evidence is presented. Makes a halfway decent speculative case. I would not be surprised if it were at least partly true.

THen he goes off kilter implying that Bush Jr, the President killed JFK Jr.... remember that JFK Jr died in a small plane crash? Well, at the end the film speculates that Bush hit the plane with a shoulder-fired ground to air missle...while he took a short break from the 2000 GOP primary....WHOA!

I dunno about Hankey. Not sure what he wanted from this film. To spread knowledge? Money? Revenge/justice? Fame?

Interesting film.